Formal multi-product break-even-analysis: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Zeile 42: Zeile 42:
==The case of two products with individual and joint fixed costs==
==The case of two products with individual and joint fixed costs==
Sometimes, cost-volume-profit analysis has to cope both with individual and joint fixed costs. Typical examples are '''multi-stage production processes''': Computers are often manufactured for global customers in a single plant (with joint fixed costs) and customized to local specifications (power plugs, manuals, packaging, …) in local facilities. Movie production requires a large joint cost block to get the director’s cut, but finishing, translating, synchronization, subtitles and marketing are done separately for different countries or languages and cause individual fixed costs. <br>
Sometimes, cost-volume-profit analysis has to cope both with individual and joint fixed costs. Typical examples are '''multi-stage production processes''': Computers are often manufactured for global customers in a single plant (with joint fixed costs) and customized to local specifications (power plugs, manuals, packaging, …) in local facilities. Movie production requires a large joint cost block to get the director’s cut, but finishing, translating, synchronization, subtitles and marketing are done separately for different countries or languages and cause individual fixed costs. <br>
In our two-product case, we introduce K<sup>f</sup><sub>1</sub> and K<sup>f</sup><sub>2</sub> to capture the individual fixed costs of products 1 and 2 and get the following break-even-form:<br>
In our two-product case, we introduce K<sup>f</sup><sub>1</sub> and K<sup>f</sup><sub>2</sub> to capture the individual (or direct) fixed costs of products 1 and 2 and get the following break-even-form:<br>


: (p<sub>1</sub>-k<sup>v</sup><sub>1</sub>) &middot; x<sub>1</sub> + (p<sub>2</sub>-k<sup>v</sup><sub>2</sub>) &middot; x<sub>2</sub> = d<sub>1</sub> &middot; x<sub>1</sub> + d<sub>2</sub> &middot; x<sub>2</sub> ≥ K<sup>f</sup> + K<sup>f</sup><sub>1</sub> + K<sup>f</sup><sub>2</sub><br>
: (p<sub>1</sub>-k<sup>v</sup><sub>1</sub>) &middot; x<sub>1</sub> + (p<sub>2</sub>-k<sup>v</sup><sub>2</sub>) &middot; x<sub>2</sub> = d<sub>1</sub> &middot; x<sub>1</sub> + d<sub>2</sub> &middot; x<sub>2</sub> ≥ K<sup>f</sup> + K<sup>f</sup><sub>1</sub> + K<sup>f</sup><sub>2</sub><br>
Zeile 54: Zeile 54:
: x<sub>2</sub> ≥ x<sub>1</sub>  = K<sup>f</sup>/d<sub>2</sub>  <br>
: x<sub>2</sub> ≥ x<sub>1</sub>  = K<sup>f</sup>/d<sub>2</sub>  <br>


The solution of the two individual conditions results in two break-even-points x<sub>1</sub>* and x<sub>2</sub>*. Considering for the joint fixed cost leads to two break-even-corner-points x<sub>1</sub>** and x<sub>2</sub>**. The possible break-even-points lie on the line between these corner-points. The graphical presentation of this case is similar to the previous case without individual fixed costs. However, we adjust the horizontal axes (x<sub>1</sub> and x<sub>2</sub>) for the volumes that are necessary to cover the individual fixed costs.<br>  
The solution of the two individual conditions results in two break-even-points [[Datei:x_circle_1.png]] and [[Datei:x_circle_2.png]]. Considering too for the joint fixed cost leads to two break-even-corner-points [[Datei:x_tilde_1.png]] and [[Datei:x_tilde_1.png]]. The possible break-even-points lie on the line between these corner-points. The graphical presentation of this case is similar to the previous case without individual fixed costs. However, we adjust the horizontal axes (x<sub>1</sub> and x<sub>2</sub>) for the units that are necessary to cover the individual fixed costs.<br>  


[[Datei:break-even-line-both.png|thumb|left]]<br>
[[Datei:break-even-line-both.png|thumb|left]]<br>
Zeile 64: Zeile 64:
: [[Datei:break-even-line-joint-set.png]]
: [[Datei:break-even-line-joint-set.png]]


Note, that different to the previous case without individual fixed costs (and different to the formula proposed in Schweitzer/Troßmann (1998, p. 177), in this case the set of break-even-points is not just a linear combination of the two break-even-corner-points x<sub>1</sub>** and x<sub>2</sub>**. Instead, it still is a linear combination of the break-even-points x<sub>1</sub>* and x<sub>2</sub>*, corresponding to the joint fixed costs, plus the quantities x<sub>1</sub>* and x<sub>2</sub>*  to cover the individual fixed costs.
Note, that different to the previous case without individual fixed costs (and different to the formula proposed in Schweitzer/Troßmann (1998, p. 177), in this case the set of break-even-points is not just a linear combination of the two break-even-corner-points[[Datei:x_tilde_1.png]] and [[Datei:x_tilde_2.png]]. Instead, it still is a linear combination of the break-even-points [[Datei:x_hat_1.png]] and [[Datei:x_hat_1.png]], corresponding to the joint fixed costs, plus the units [[Datei:x_circle_1.png]] and [[Datei:x_circle_2.png]] necessary to cover the individual fixed costs.
 


== Analysis of the two-product case with restrictions==
== Analysis of the two-product case with restrictions==
ConfirmedUser, Student, Bürokraten, Administratoren
589

Bearbeitungen

Navigationsmenü